Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahrenheit 56K
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fahrenheit 56K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable play. It doesn't seem to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. (Some reviews are linked in the External Links, but it's not clear that they're reliable.) The author doesn't have a Wikipedia page, and there's no record of the play ever being performed. This seems to be an entirely insignificant work of fiction. Robofish (talk) 00:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CE very difficult
[edit]I copyedited this article (it was on the list), in February 2011, although I did not understand much of it! At the time I stated that I had not removed the CE tag because I believed that the article still required a lot of work. Since then it has been CE'd any number of times.
Re-reading my own comments on the talk page, I could hardly de-cipher them, (likewise User: Lenoxin's)!
If the article cannot be saved, I would say there is nothing wrong with deleting it. It doesn't seem to improve Wikipedia, get rid.
RASAM (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find the significant coverage at reliable independent sources as required. -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\[alternative account of Phantomsteve] 05:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim to any notability, let alone proven. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.